Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical

Click to Zoom in

Alternate ImageAlternate ImageAlternate ImageAlternate Image

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical

48-bit Color - 8-bit Grayscale - USB - View Complete Details

Product Number: SYNX3440592

4.1 star rating4.132 reviewsRead All ReviewsWrite a Review

In Stock - Hurry, only 9 left.

Estimated Delivery - 5 business day(s) - Mon 8/28 6 business days - Mon 8/28

Free Shipping - This item qualifies for Free Shipping

Accessories

You May Also Like

More like this

Product Details

Not
Returnable
Not Returnable

Due to its limited shelf life or other concerns, we do not accept returns on this product unless it is damaged, defective or incorrect due to an error on our part.

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical - Enjoy high-speed scanning for everything from photos to documents, to even 35mm film while also enjoying superb quality. The CanoScan 9000F Mark II Color Image Scanner, a high-speed scanner with professional film scanning quality. With 9600 x 9600 maximum color dpi1, it produces incredible detail in both business documents and photographs. The CanoScan 9000F Mark II also helps you get the most out of your photos and documents with My Image Garden2 software, offering a simple and intuitive way to scan and organize your files.

View More Product Details
Still have a question? Click to ask a Question

Reviews

REVIEW SNAPSHOT®

by PowerReviews
Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical
 
4.1

(based on 32 reviews)

Ratings Distribution

  • 5 Stars

     

    (20)

  • 4 Stars

     

    (4)

  • 3 Stars

     

    (2)

  • 2 Stars

     

    (2)

  • 1 Stars

     

    (4)

82%

of respondents would recommend this to a friend.

Pros

  • Great resolution (6)
  • Easy to use (5)
  • Fast connectivity (5)
  • High-speed scanning (4)

Cons

No Cons

Best Uses

No Best Uses

Most Liked Positive Review

 

Canon 9000F Mark II Scanner

As any real photographer knows when it comes to equipment, the proof is in the photograph. That being said, the following is a photographer oriented review in that image quality is valued first...Read complete review

As any real photographer knows when it comes to equipment, the proof is in the photograph. That being said, the following is a photographer oriented review in that image quality is valued first and foremost. I picked up my 9000 F Mark II two days ago and since then I have run a number of real-world tests on it. Unfortunately, I could not compare it to the original 9000 F since I don't have one available, however, my 9000 F Mark II seems to perform better based on the early reviews of the original 9000 F. I'll speak to that momentarily, but keep in mind that I cannot really account for the validity of anyone else's results. So in fact, there may be indeed be no difference in image quality between recent manufacturers of the two models. This is a summary of what I did found on the Mark II: Regarding Platen use with flat documents and photographs, I found the scanner to be very fast, and it produced excellent quality in terms of color accuracy and neutrality. In fact, after profiling it with two different IT8 targets using third-party software I found that all this resulted in was a loss of color neutrality and an exaggeration of contrast, which I really didn't care for on either count. In reality, the Canon ScanGear software produced the best results and was much easier to work with. At 300 dpi with 48 bit color it averaged around 9 seconds for an A4 size document and it produced a 51 MB Tiff file, which I found to be more than adequate for PDFs that were much better than than my MX870 or Lide600F. At 600 dpi it took 26 seconds to produce a 48 bit 102 MB Tiff file that would be better for larger reproductions. At 1200 dpi it took 1 min. and 44 seconds to produce a 409 MB 48 bit Tiff file that was, very critically speaking, sharper than the 600 dpi scan, however, you have to uncheck the thumbnail view in ScanGear to do this and you would never be able to tell the difference on an 8 x 10 anyway. So I'm going with 600 dpi as a standard for photographs, because frankly there's no good reason for more especially when you just start to see ink jet patterns and minute dust, aside from simple fact that a 102 MB file doesn't take a supercomputer linked to server farms for storage, unlike the 409 MB 1200 dpi files when things begin to add up. Film Scanning After a number of tests I found that 2400 dpi resulted in the sharpest scans, which may not seem to make sense at first but it was true nevertheless. Even with FARE Medium enabled it only took an average of 1 min. and 30 seconds on Kodachrome to produce a 40 MB 48 bit Tiff file. Increasing the resolution to 4800 dpi or 9600 dpi was a real loser on three fronts. First the sharpness got progressively worse at these "higher dpi settings", the times increased dramatically, as well as the file sizes, which reached an absurd 625 MB 48 bit Tiff, again with fare enabled. So 2400 dpi with FARE enabled (which did not effect the sharpness) was the winner! While again I couldn't compare the film performance with the 9000 F original I was able to compare it to my older dedicated film scanner the CanoScan FS4000US, which could only be used with third-party software and produced considerably more noise. In terms of resolution though the dedicated film scanner was better, although it wasn't very noticeable on 4 x 6 prints and took a good deal of advanced Photoshop techniques to fully utilize. So for smaller print reproductions, speed (1 min. 30 seconds compared to 8 min. 30 seconds on the old film scanner) and the color quality of the color negative scans I'll definitely use my 9000 F Mark II for archiving and cataloging and when I have one of those well-crafted images that I want to print large I'll simply rescan on the film scanner, which by the way is not supported on the newer operating systems unless you purchase third-party software that includes its own drivers. In conclusion, I am really happy with the scanner at least partially because I didn't expect magical results on critically high quality film images. As I mentioned earlier, even though I could not compare it to the original 9000 F I did not find any problems whatsoever in terms of overall image quality and ease-of-use based on my real-world tests, in fact I found that the new ScanGear produced excellent color overall and particularly with regard to color negatives. This differs from what some earlier reviews of the original 9000 F claimed to be issues. Even for film scans I found that the quality was really not an issue unless you're going 8 x 10 or larger with a really good original. Hope this helps.

VS

Most Liked Negative Review

 

Waste of time and money

Not too sure why canon made this. I picked one up to scan film with and the quality is terrible, down right awful. Scans are generally pretty ugly and need a fair amount...Read complete review

Not too sure why canon made this. I picked one up to scan film with and the quality is terrible, down right awful. Scans are generally pretty ugly and need a fair amount of work to make them look slightly less terrible but terrible nonetheless. Scanning software says the image will be one size but after copying the image into the Lightroom to work with it the file size is about a quarter of what scan gear says it will be. Very disappointed in this product and if you're thinking of getting one, don't!!

Reviewed by 32 customers

Displaying reviews 1-20

Back to top

Previous | Next »

 
1.0

Out of the box not working right

By 

from Undisclosed

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

It only scans 1 strip of negatives correctly. When I switch them then the other strip scans correctly, so it is not the negatives itself. Basically the "top" strip does not scan the way it is supposed to be. Disappointed!!

(1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)

 
4.0

Love it.

By 

from Texas, United States

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I have scanned about 700 images (prints, slides and negs) and I am very pleased with the quality.

 
5.0

Great for dredging up old family memories!

By 

from NC

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I bought this scanner this summer and originally wasn't using it much. We'd just received about 6 boxes full of old slides and negatives and I had the best intentions but not clear timeline. Fast forward to the last week and now we are moving and I have no intention of taking those boxes with me. Now I'm powering through and I'm so impressed with this scanner. The picture quality is plenty good enough for what we want (to access and share all these long forgotten pictures) and the scanner itself is very intuitive. I love that the plastic attachments make each slide scan in as an individual picture in the desired orientation. So far I'm happy scanning slides, film, and printed pictures.

(2 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Perfect scanner, does what itbsays

By 

from New York, NY, United States

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I bought this scanner to digitize photo albums and slides and negatives from over 40 years. The scanner is big enough in surface area to scan multiple photos at once if they are smaller in size, and can capture larger sizes easily. I scan 35mm plus 120mm film and even slides. I scan documents and make them PDFs, scan to email and scan to storage drives. I work with Mac so I can't speak to the Windows issue. But this scanner is perfect and does everything as advertised. I highly recommend.

(4 of 4 customers found this review helpful)

 
1.0

Waste of time and money

By 

from Randolph, NJ, United States

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

Not too sure why canon made this. I picked one up to scan film with and the quality is terrible, down right awful. Scans are generally pretty ugly and need a fair amount of work to make them look slightly less terrible but terrible nonetheless. Scanning software says the image will be one size but after copying the image into the Lightroom to work with it the file size is about a quarter of what scan gear says it will be. Very disappointed in this product and if you're thinking of getting one, don't!!

(3 of 3 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Haters Need A Dose Of Reality...

By 

from Monterey Park, CA, United States

Verified Buyer

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

Since this product DOES work with Windows 10, I'm going to ignore every complaint about how it does not...

What gets overlooked is that there is no native support for TWAIN-64 in Windows: blame Microsoft for that, not the scanner manufacturers. Software products like Vuescan bypass that problem and make this scanner available regardless whatever version of Windows is being used. The CanoScan software is available as a WIA scanner option in any application which allows for the user to choose the input source; again, get over it.

One of the best indicators of the results this scanner can achieve, comes from scanning 16mm film frames: I can get 5" x 7" prints out of a film size which is a bit smaller than 110 negative.

This scanner is not for the casual user, by any means. A CanoScan 220 is a much safer choice for the under-initiated. If you want to work for top results and need affordable power, this scanner IS the best choice, and does not cost an arm and a leg in the process.

(2 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Works FineOn My PC With Windows 10

By 

from Houston, TX, United States

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I use this scanner to scan slides, film negatives and photos. It does a great job running on Windows 10. A bit slower than I'd like but all scanners I've used have that issue.

(9 of 9 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Excellent scanner

By 

from Cornwall, NY

Verified Buyer

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I bought this scanner in June 2014 to replace an old Microtek scanner. Haven't had any problems with this product. I noticed some reviews complaining about incompatibility with Windows 10. I have not had this problem since I upgraded from Win 8 to 10 early in 2015.

(2 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

 
1.0

Good when the software works.

By 

from Oakland, CA, United States

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

The scans are respectable for a scanner in this price category. Be prepared for it to stop working every time your OS is updated. This is the first Canon product I will be "round filing." Too bad.

(2 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

 
1.0

incompatible with n

By 

from Oxford, UK

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I would have given 5 stars until recently, but Canon fails on keeping drivers up-to-date, which broke the integration into MacOS 10.11. All these nice scan buttons on the facia became in-operational with the latest version of MacOS. Canon acknowledges that this is the case, but don't even claim that they'd be working on a fix. I'm looking for a scanner of a different brand now.

 
5.0

Amazing piece of equipment!

By 

from Ridgewood, NJ

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I just installed my new Canon 9000F Mk II Scanner, and scanned four slides from a trip I took to Hong Kong in 1962 An amazing piece of equipment. Fast, sharp and easy to use. Canon at its best. Canon PERIOD!

 
5.0

Love it! (My Canon 9000F Scanner, that is)

By 

from Undisclosed

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I have been immensely pleased with this scanner. I got it primarily for scanning 35mm negatives and slides and the performance has been outstanding. I normally scan negatives at 2400 dpi even thought higher resolutions are available. I have been also scanning photos and the ability to scan up to 3 photos at once directly into Photoshop CS2 has proved to be very quick and and has also given me great results at 600 dpi. My only complaint has been the inability to scan 110 film negatives or any kind of 8mm/16mm frames even though the resolutions afforded would be adequate for most purposes.

(1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Great purchase for me

By 

from West Michigan

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

At one time I had my own dark room enlarger. It had gotten boxed up when I moved to a another city. I had a shoe box my mother left with all different years of negatives. All the changes from film to the new cameras i thought that I probably not get to make prints from my old negatives. I have built a folder from slides, color negatives, and the old b/w negatives. I have made folders off albums that my wife had been wanting to save to disc.

(2 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Best Scanner Ever!

By 

from Walla Walla, WA

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

My old scanner died years ago and I finally decided to purchase another one. I did a lot of research and the CanoScan had the best reviews overall. I decided to order it from the Canon website and was very happy with the additional service guarantee I would get by using their site. Scanner was super easy to install. It is also user friendly and easy to run as well.

(1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Great improvement

By 

from Western US

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

Purchased he 9000F MarkII to replace a HP4050 that was no longer directly supported for connectivity with the Yosemite OS. The Canon printer is a significant improvement, providing faster, quieter operation, easier downloading, better quality image scans and more intuitive functionality.

(2 of 3 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

CanoScan 9000F

By 

from Succasunna

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I do not own any other scanners, so I cannot compare to other brands, but this scanner is great! I have many older slides and pictures that I am in the process of converting to digital. So far, the results have been excellent. Some of my older pictures were faded, and not only did the scanner make them sharper, but clearer, so now I can see items in the picture that I had not noticed before. It is great! I am very satisfied with the scanner. I tested with pictures, slides, and negatives, and all the results were very good.

(1 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

quality product

By 

from Fenton MI

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

Not much to say. Works better than expected. My wife is copying several thousand slides. She is well into the project and is very happy with the results. Tried other converter products with poor results. The high quality of these results are amazing. Colors are bright and vibrant. Many of the slides are over 50 years old. Would definitely recommend this product.

(1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Great purchase for me

By 

from West Michign

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

This is great. I have a lot of old b/w negatives to print. I am also doing copies of pictures from albums. I have 35mm slides, 35mm color and b/w negatives to print. The great part is that the old b/w negatives will fit in the tray provided with this unit. I have been putting copies on my computer and learning a lot about of what this unit can do.

(1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)

 
2.0

Quite disappointing

By 

from Southern Blue Ridge Mountians

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

Canon has long been my favorite camera company, but the CanoScan 9000F scanner is much less than I would have hoped. While it can handle my medium format film quite well, it does a very poor job with my 35 mm. slides. I might add that the instructions as to how to access the Advanced Mode for scanning the larger format film was exceedingly obtuse. All in all, most disappointing, all things considered.

(1 of 3 customers found this review helpful)

 
4.0

Nice looking scanner

By 

from Colorado

Comments about Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner - 9600 dpi Optical:

I look forward to learning how to run the scanner! I know why there was no printed documentation that came with the machine. 500 plus pages online. I generally print all manuals but not this one. Still looking for the quick start manual so I can start to scan some slides I took in Vietnam, Hong Kong, and Sydney back in 1968. Check back when I learn more about the Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II.

Displaying reviews 1-20

Back to top

Previous | Next »

"Write your Opinion"

Help others make the right choice.
Tell them what you think.

Write a Review

Question & Answer

No questions have been posted for this product.

Have a question about this product? Please click the button below to get started. Once you have posted your question we will submit it to our community of customers and with our own staff who have recent experience with the same product for their open and honest feedback.

Ask a Question